Olympic Wireless Service

Wireless internet service will be available at all media areas – including the FOP, tribunes etc, in Sha Tin and in the media workroom at Beas River.

The charge will be the same as in the Media Centre in Beijing, i.e RMB2,600, which is roughly EUR 250.  Just to emphasise this point, it is the standard price for EVERY member of the media attending this Games.  I have noted your views that there should be no cost at all but that would be a matter for post event.

This price covers the WHOLE period from 27 July to 23 September.

In addition, access will be available for the equivalent of around EUR 20 for those who will only stay for a day or two.

Rumours mentioning prices as high as EUR 1,000 or 2,000 – are unfounded.

Hotel

ââ?¬Â¢  Media can walk from their hotel to the press centre

The shuttle service will function 24h a day on competition days

The press centre will be open 24h a day.

General

ââ?¬Â¢  Exact details on how to secure internet access in Hong Kong will be circulated shortly.   NB the arrangements for gaining this access will be different from those journalists in Beijing – a special form will be supplied to the HK media.

Candy Burnyeat

FEI Director of Communications (Interim)

Report on the Preparations for the 2008 Olympics in Hong Kong

A group of equestrian journalists visited the Olympic venues in Hong Kong in November to meet the organizers and see first hand how preparations for the Games were progressing. This was the second group to visit this year – the first group went in March – and the first Olympic Games to offer a preview to the media. The visits were by invitation of The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Information Services Department and The Hong Kong Jockey Club.

The Hong Kong Sports Institute (HKSI) and Penfold Park at Sha Tin will host the principle Olympic complex, including a main competition arena and training arenas for the dressage and jumping events. The Club has also provided facilities at the Hong Kong Golf Club and the Beas River Country Club for the cross-country phase of the eventing competition. The Hong Kong Jockey Club has contributed over US$100 million to produce venues and facilities for the 2008 Olympic and Paralympic equestrian events of jumping, dressage and eventing. See below for more information about the competition venues.

Visitors were shown all the competition venues as well as the quarantine facilities, exercise areas and the Hong Kong Jockey Club’s Racing Laboratory. The Hong Kong Sports Institute facilities, which are adjacent to the main arena at Sha Tin, are being used for the Main Press Center (MPC). A gym, measuring 658 m2 total floor area, is being divided into a combined working area of 458 m2. The gym is also being used for press conferences, ancillary offices, welcome desk, services, etc. The IOC recommendations for journalist working space is for tables of 1.8 meters long to provide 3 seats of 600mm per seat and two per table for photographers at 900mm per seat. Spaces can be booked through the Press Officer. There are large lockers two high along the corridor outside the gym and additional lockers on the lower floor where a lounge area has been designated. After discussions with The Equestrian Company and Jockey Club, the visiting delegation suggested that the photographer’s working area in the gym be re-located to the lounge area downstairs. It was generally felt that the working space would be crowded with 404 accredited media (255 print and 131 photographers plus 18 non-rights broadcasters) and that this arrangement would give both journalists and photographers better space. There is seating for 264 journalists and 50 photographers. The organizers indicated they would consider this option.

There will be WiFi throughout the building – both upstairs in the press center and downstairs in the dining room and lounge ([or photographer’s room] for which there will be a charge.

The dining room will have seating for 116 people and offer counter style service. There will be a charge for food.

The press conference room measuring 200 m2, which is separated from the working area in the gym by a temporary 2.5m high wall and drapes, will have seating for 180 plus a 10 meter wide platform at the rear for TV cameras. Lighting will be boosted to 1400 lux.

The organizers are anticipating that media will have their own mobile phone and will be invited to register upon sign-in to receive SMS text messages of games information. Rental cell phones will also be available.

The media tribune, which is accessed by going down one floor from the press center and along a corridor to the west side of the arena, will having desk spaces for 108 and 92 in the non-tabled stands. It is unknown at this time whether WiFi or wired internet access would be provided in the tribunes but the question was presented to the organizers. Since it is unclear at this time if designated seating will be allocated in the press tribune, this would be a topic for follow-up with the Press Officer.

There will be additional media seating on the north side of the arena to accommodate 110 journalists/photographers.

Photographers will be free to access all four sides of the arena on the grass area.

The Mixed Zone, which is located close to the in-gate and the north tribune press seats (closer than the west tribune), will accommodate about 100 people.

The satellite press room at Beas River Country Club for the cross country will accommodate 100 journalists in the working room and 108 in the press conference room.

Photographers will be able to move between the cross country fences inside the ropes as long as they are within reach of the rope at all times.

Press Officer

The organizers are currently reviewing a short list of applicants for this position and expect the successful candidate to be employed early in the New Year.

Photo Manager

The organizers are currently researching suitable applicants for the position and indicated an interest in a general sports photographer. It was impressed upon them the need to engage an equestrian sports photographer for this position as specialist knowledge is critical. The organizers indicated they would consider our recommendation.

Media Hotel

The Media Hotel is located 2 km from the Sha Tin venue. Shuttles will be provided.

Transportation

Cabs and private transportation will not have access to the venue. A cab ride from downtown to the airport cost HK$370. The Airport Express train operates between the airport and downtown.

Venues

The Hong Kong Jockey Club will provide:

A main competition arena for dressage and jumping with a seating capacity of over 18,000, with a supporting warm-up arena.

13 training dressage and jumping arenas, namely:
2 general training arenas
5 dressage training arenas
4 dressage/jumping training arenas
1 jumping training arena
1 indoor air-conditioned training arena

A temporary 5.7km x 10m cross-country course at the Hong Kong Golf Club and the adjacent Beas River Country Club at Fanling

An 800m cross-country training track and schooling area and a 1,200m bridle path at Penfold Park. A turf gallop track will also be made available at Sha Tin.

Office

The Club is modifying the existing facilities at the Hong Kong Sports Institute to provide office and hospitality space for the Olympic family, event and venue management officials, VIPs, sponsors and the FEI.

Stables

The Club has constructed 225 state-of-the-art air-conditioned stables at the main competition venue:
A purpose-built Main Stabling Complex comprising 200 stables in four stable blocks.
A separate block of 25 air-conditioned stables for reserve horses.

Veterinary Services – equine hospital and equine clinic:

The Club will make its Equine Hospital facilities and services available for emergency operations during the Games period. The hospital has an operating theatre and an associated anesthetic and recovery room, as well as a clinical laboratory. A well-known specialist in equine orthopedics heads the 44-strong team that includes veterinarians, nurses, laboratory technicians, administrative staff members and farriers. The Club has also built a separate equine clinic at the Olympic venue for diagnostic and treatment services.

Laboratory Ã?¢ââ??‰â?¬Å? The FEIÃ?¢ââ??‰â??¢s sole Reference Laboratory in Asia

The internationally accredited on-site Racing Laboratory at the Club’s world-class Sha Tin Racecourse will provide its services to test equine samples for the presence of prohibited substances.

The laboratory has 42 staff and is equipped with about US$8 million worth of facilities, including 22 mass spectrometers. The laboratory conducts tests on over 18,000 samples a year.

The laboratory has been testing FEI samples for many years. It was appointed as the FEI’s sole Reference Laboratory in Asia in 2001. “A” samples from the 2002 and 2006 Asian Games and high-profile equestrian events within Asia (e.g., in Japan, Malaysia and the Middle East), as well as “B” samples from the 2004 Olympic Games have all been analyzed by the laboratory.

Dr Terence Wan, head of the racing laboratory, has pledged to turn around equine samples in record time during the 2008 Olympics and Paralympic equestrian events.

Local Horse Transportation

The Club will make available its modern fleet of 10 horse transportation floats that together can carry 99 horses at any one period. Hong Kong has recognized equine importation and exportation health protocols, which enable horses to be temporarily imported from and exported to about 17 countries.

Day 1

August 9 (Saturday)

 

Session EQ01

Start: 06:30

End: 10:30

Hong Kong Olympic Equestrian Venue (Sha Tin)

 

06:30-10:30

Team & Individual Eventing Dressage – Day 1

 

Session EQ02

Start: 19:15

End: 23:15

Hong Kong Olympic Equestrian Venue (Sha Tin)

 

19:15-23:15

Team & Individual Eventing Dressage – Day 1

Day 2

August 10 (Sunday)

 

Session EQ03

Start: 06:30

End: 10:30

Hong Kong Olympic Equestrian Venue (Sha Tin)

 

06:30-10:30

Team & Individual Eventing Dressage – Day 2

Day 3

August 11 (Monday)

 

Session EQ04

Start: 08:00

End: 11:30

Hong Kong Olympic Equestrian Venue (Beas River)

 

08:00-11:30

Team & Individual Eventing Ã?¢ââ??‰â?¬Å? Cross-Country

Day 4

August 12 (Tuesday)

 

Session EQ05

Start: 19:15

End: 24:30

Hong Kong Olympic Equestrian Venue (Sha Tin)

 

19:15-22:15

Team Eventing Jumping – Final

 

22:30-23:30

Individual Eventing Jumping – Final

 

23:45-24:15

Team Eventing Medal Ceremony

 

24:15-24:30

Individual Eventing Medal Ceremony

Day 5

August 13 (Wednesday)

 

Session EQ06

Start: 19:15

End: 24:15

Hong Kong Olympic Equestrian Venue (Sha Tin)

 

19:15-24:15

Team Dressage Grand Prix & Individual Dressage Qualifier

Grand Prix – Day 1

Day 6

August 14 (Thursday)

 

Session EQ07

Start: 19:15

End: 24:30

Hong Kong Olympic Equestrian Venue (Sha Tin)

 

19:15-23:45

Team Dressage Grand Prix & Individual Dressage Qualifier

Grand Prix – Day 2

 

24:00-24:30

Team Dressage Medal Ceremony

Day 7

August 15 (Friday)

 

Session EQ08

Start: 19:15

End: 23:15

Hong Kong Olympic Equestrian Venue (Sha Tin)

 

19:15-23:15

Individual Jumping Qualification – 1st Qualifier

Day 8

August 16 (Saturday)

 

Session EQ09

Start: 19:15

End: 24:00

Hong Kong Olympic Equestrian Venue

(Sha Tin)

 

19:15-24:00

Individual Dressage Grand Prix Special

Day 9

August 17 (Sunday)

 

Session EQ10

Start: 19:15

End: 23:15

Hong Kong Olympic Equestrian Venue (Sha Tin)

 

19:15-23:15

Team Jumping Final – Round 01 & Individual Jumping

Qualification – 2nd Qualifier

Day 10

August 18 (Monday)

 

Session EQ11

Start: 19:15

End: 23:00

Hong Kong Olympic Equestrian Venue (Sha Tin)

 

19:15-22:15

Team Jumping Final – Round 02 & Individual Jumping

Qualification – 3rd Qualifier

 

22:30-23:00

Team Jumping Medal Ceremony

Day 11

August 19 (Tuesday)

 

Session EQ12

Start: 19:15

End: 23:00

Hong Kong Olympic Equestrian Venue (Sha Tin)

 

19:15-22:15

Individual Dressage Final Grand Prix Freestyle

 

22:30-23:00

Individual Dressage Medal Ceremony

Day 12

August 20 (Wednesday)

 

Rest Day

Day 13

August 21 (Thursday)

 

Session EQ13

Start: 19:15

End: 23:45

Hong Kong Olympic Equestrian Venue

(Sha Tin)

 

19:15-21:00

Individual Jumping Final Ã?¢ââ??‰â?¬Å? Round A

 

22:00-23:00

Individual Jumping Final Ã?¢ââ??‰â?¬Å? Round B

 

23:15-23:45

Individual Jumping Medal Ceremony

Day 14

August 22 (Friday)

 

Reserve Day

Day 15

August 23 (Saturday)

 

Reserve Day

Withdrawal of Swiss Dressage Team from Olympic Equestrian Events in Hong Kong

In response to media enquiries for Club comments on the withdrawal of the Swiss dressage team from this year’s Olympic Equestrian Events, a Hong Kong Jockey Club spokesperson has the following response:

In consultation with the International Equestrian Federation (FEI) and internationally renowned experts, The Jockey Club took the Hong Kong climate into consideration when constructing the venues and has also taken a large number of other measures to minimise the effects of heat and humidity on the horses. These measures include the provision of air-conditioning from the moment the horses land, with the horses being transported in the Club’s air-conditioned lorries; air-conditioned Olympic stabling complex; the first-ever Olympic air-conditioned indoor training arena; four misting tents at both the core venue and at the cross-country venue; troughs of chilled water and an ample supply of ice at each misting tent and at each holding point on the cross-country course; chilled water sprays and mobile cooling units at both the core venue and on the cross-country course.

In addition there is a purpose-built Veterinary Clinic at the core venue adjacent to the stables compound, which will be staffed with a team of veterinary surgeons with considerable experience at Olympic level, including the 1996 Atlanta Olympics, where similar weather conditions prevailed.
The Good Luck Beijing HKSAR 10th Anniversary Cup test event in August 2007 attracted competitors from eight visiting nations Ã?¢ââ??‰â?¬Å? Germany, Netherlands, USA, Britain, Australia, France, Sweden and Ireland.

For further information, please contact:
Grania Willis
Public Affairs Consultant
T: 2966-5858
M: 6792-6147
grania.willis@hkjc.org.hk

Claire Lau
Public Affairs Manager (Equestrian Events)
T: 2966-7402
Pager: 7315-3059
claire.ym.lau@hkjc.org.hk

Please also refer to the press release from the Equestrian Company, which is the organiser of the equestrian competitions at the 2008 Olympics, and to www.eurodressage.com for further background information.

Report on the European Dressage Championships

The conditions for journalists and photographers during the EC Dressage in Turin were anything but easy and professional. A lot of the problems came as a result of unprofessional preparation so there was not much to be done once the show had started. But I want to emphasize, that the very friendly press team did try to help us, although none of them spoke good enough English to discuss more complicated items.

The first severe problem was the distance between the entrance of the parc La Mandria, were no cars except some shuttles for riders and officials were allowed to enter. The shuttle bus for the press, which left every morning at the press hotel and brought us back in the evening, stopped at the entrance, from there you had to march nearly one kilometre to the builing where the press centre was established. After some discussions, some of us were lucky and fetched one of the small shuttle cars, to bring us to the press centre. The walk was much too long especially for the photographers with their heavy equipment.

The press centre itself was in a big building together with the show office and other administration offices. There was sufficient space for the working journalists and photographers in three rooms, two of them with a television set. The television and sometimes the scoreboard did not work. The Internet (Wireless Lan) was, as I was told, rather slow. The results came too slow.

Once you made your way to the press centre problems were not solved at all because there was another walk of perhaps 800 metres to the arena. There were press seats with tables, although not very comfortable, but no electricity at all, nor an internet connection. TD Gotthielf Riexinger tried to help and to get us electricity at the press stand, but was told, that this was not possible, in case of a thunderstorm or rain, because the stand was mainly built with metal. That meant, one could hardly work there. As the distance between press centre and arena was too far to “commute” quickly, you either had the choice to work in front of the television and not to speak to riders, trainers etc. until the press conference in the evening, or to be down at the venue and not being able to work. For colleagues working on deadlines that turned out to be very difficult, if not impossible. There was after two days a shuttle service established, but you could not rely on it, especially when you were in a hurry. Sometimes some kind rider would pick you up in the little golf cars every team could use. The access to the riders was very good, at lunch, at the training area or in the stand. The only solution would have been to put a press tent directly next to the arena with all necessary facilities.

At the beginning, there was no refreshment at all in the press centre, but from day two on we got water, coffee, tea and some sandwiches. But we were all invited every day to lunch at one of two facilities, which was very generous indeed. Also we were invited to a fabulous evening reception at the big castle together with the riders, judges and so on, which we enjoyed very much.

Winter 2007 – From the President

On behalf of the new IAEJ bureau, recently elected in Aachen for a new four year term, I would like to take this opportunity to wish all our members the very best for 2007. We work in a global media sphere where things are changing fast and the pressures can sometimes be intense.

Along with fellow bureau member and colleague Kit Houghton, I attended the annual general meeting of the International Equestrian OrganizersÃ?¢ââ??‰â??¢ Alliance (IEOA) at the beginning of December in Geneva. I told them that the IAEJ is quite serious about ensuring the best possible working conditions for our members who make their living either wholly or partly from reporting about horse sports; members who are highly concerned by what is going on in their professional daily life. This is why the Alliance was started in 1966 (40 years already!), as representative of a true and important part of the equestrian world.

This is why the IAEJ is fully representative at the highest level of the sport by being the proper interlocutor of the equestrian sport when special matters have to be discussed or are discussed.

This is why, in the months since the World Equestrian Games in Aachen where we were elected, the bureau has updated the guidelines for show organizers in accordance with the FEI communications department. Thanks for their co-operation and to fellow bureau members who put in their time on this project. We now plan to distribute these guidelines to organisers across all FEI disciplines.

This why we Ã?¢ââ??‰â?¬Å? with Lucia Montanarella who has already opened the door of the IOC and AIPS Ã?¢ââ??‰â?¬Å? have already started negotiating with Beijing through the FEI on the quota of specialised journalists which will be available for the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games to be held in Hong Kong and also on the press facilities to be provided there.

This is why we are already looking forward to the 2010 Kentucky WEG. Lessons learned in Aachen (see our members’ reports in this newsletter) should serve us well in Kentucky. We have sent detailed reports to both Aachen and Kentucky WEG organisers pointing up what was right and what was wrong at this year’s WEG in the hope Kentucky will take note and act and improve on the latter!

I have no doubt that the internet will play a bigger role in our day to day work. The newsletter now will only be circulated by internet. I do believe that internet can be a way of communication among us, but it will never replace the face to face and the live debate. This is why after listening to many suggestions guided by one priority, making decisions quicker and easier, I would be for my part, more moderate in this regard. Certainly if any members have any comments or questions concerning any of the work we do or need to report any incident or event of which we should be aware, then by all means please contact any of us by e-mail. But main decisions will continue to be discussed and taken in open assemblies, possibly after an internet survey. For example, we are currently looking at designs for a new logo for the IAEJ. If anyone has any input on that they should let us know. We are also investigating a means of secure on-line voting so that members unable to attend our annual general assemblies (in Las Vegas in April 2007) can still vote in elections, etc.

Now as a last point, we have grown over the years to almost 250 members. We considered in Aachen that quality was more important than quantity. That is not meant to sound harsh but we have to be realistic. Our function as an organisation must be to serve the needs of working members of the equestrian media: journalists and photographers, who, as I said before, are fully engaged in providing equestrian coverage for their chosen outlet/s. Additionally, in order for us to be taken seriously around a negotiating table, we must be perceived as a totally professional association. That is why we have taken measures to tighten up our membership criteria. The rules for membership have been there all along in the statutes but over the years they seemed to grow fuzzy; so much so that in some cases, the two supporters named by an applicant, when approached to confirm their sponsorship, had never heard of the applicant!

Even with the best will in the world, having two offices, one in Holland and one in Canada, has proved to be confusing and membership records were in a bit of a muddle. However, thanks to the wonderful services of our treasurer Jennifer Anstey, daughter of our late president Susan Jane, we are in better shape administratively than we have been of late.

One last point. In order to keep our association vibrant and ongoing we need to recruit the newer and younger members of the media. Please encourage new members of your newsrooms, editorial staff, etc to apply for membership.

I hope to see you soon, either around and about in Europe or in Las Vegas for the World Cups in Dressage and Jumping and, of course, our AGM. In the meantime, I hope you had a Merry Christmas and best wishes from all of us on the Bureau for a Happy, Healthy and Prosperous New Year.

Pan American Games Press Services Report

While much of what appears in this report is from my perspective, I have incorporated some of the thoughts from other journalist about their observations.

There were things that were very good about the press services for the 2007 Pan American Games and others that were really terrible. The one thing that everyone seemed to agree on was that the staff was eager to assist you with any issue. The staff listened to any problems brought to them and there was ample staff to respond to questions. Unfortunately, no number of staff would have been effective in correcting problems established by rules created by administrators who were not even onsite.

The good thing was that they listened to our complaints and where they could made changes. For instance, when we arrived the first day our food was confiscated but there was no way to buy food on the premises and then they started to have fruit in the press room and a sandwich stand outside.

Access

Access for some things was great but for others was a real pain and it changed from day to day. We were not allowed access into the stables, even escorted. There were also other areas that were restricted which prevented us from meeting up with the riders in some type of outside setting to take photos. Some thought should be given to having a mixed area for media and riders for photo ops. Also, the rules constantly changed of where we could and could not go. Some of the riders wanted us to get photos of them for candids and yet we were not permitted to go to areas where there would have been no problem to do this.

One example of this constantly changing access occurred to a photographer, who described the incident as follows: The stupefying military control led to me being ordered by two armed soldiers to leave the media designated areas around the arena during the jumping training day. Only on my refusal to heed their repeated orders to leave did they finally confer by radio with, apparently, some higher power was I allowed to remain there. If this had happened in the first couple of days it would have been understandable. This happened almost two weeks into the competition.

Another reporter gave his thoughts as follows: Areas such as a standard Ã?¢ââ??¬Ã?â??mix zoneÃ?¢ââ??¬Ã? were non-existent. Rules seemed to change and then change again without any reason. Understandably, the barn area was off limits, but there should have been an area established (outside of the press center) for interaction with the riders if a mixed zone was not to be made available.

Accommodations

Way too expensive. There were less press covering the event because most didnÃ?¢ââ??‰â??¢t want to go to the expense. Because of Cealy Tetley, three of us were able to stay in ideal accommodations at a very reasonable rate, but others had to pay as much as $330 per night and more. There were also many complaints about the distance that was traveled between housing and the venue.

Air Conditioning

Was good.

Awards Ceremony

The awards ceremonies were a mixture of good and bad. Sometimes we just needed more time and the winners needed more guidance about allowing us to get the photos we needed, but in general they worked out well. I believe there should be a dedicated photo manager in the arena at the time of the awards presentation to ensure the photographers are able to get the photos they need.

Some among the media felt that a blatantly nationalistic and inconsistent behavior at medal ceremonies was obvious. This reporter used the example of how during the eventing team medals in which Brazil was on the podium that was one of the smoothest medal ceremonies from a photo standpoint. Twenty minutes later, when it came time for the individual eventing medals in which only the U.S. was on the podium, two columns of the rainbow dressed troops positioned themselves in the center of the photographers’ position and it was much more difficult for the photographers.

Backdrop for photos

There were many areas around the ring that if you shot that way the backdrop was terrible. There was also not enough Pan American Games signage.

Cross Country

We were not allowed to walk the course. This was extremely unfair on many levels.

Food

We were not allowed to bring food in and initially there was no access to food or food concessions but at our request that changed and ended up being okay. When people tried to bring their own food, it was quickly confiscated. The press center staff was able to secure fruit and water for the press after complaints. One small thermos of coffee was also provided for the press during the second week of competition. During the second week, a food vendor (carrying a box of hot dogs and sandwiches) came to the press center to sell food.

Internet

Excellent both LAN and wireless and it was free.

Language

There was a huge language barrier. Most only spoke Portuguese. There were only three staff members (among the dozens of staff that seemed to sit around the press area) that spoke English or a second language. One of them spoke French, so that enabled several people to speak and translate for others.

Lockers

They were too small for the photographers. The locker situation was terrible because we could not leave our stuff in the lockers overnight as we were told it was not safe. This meant we had to drag our cameras and computers back and forth every day which was a real pain, especially since we were there for almost three weeks.

Logos for the Pan Am Games

There were very few logos and since this was a priority to have in our photos instead we often had advertiser signage. Even if there is other signage they should also include visible signage of the event.

Media Presence

In addition there was a real lack of media presence at this event. The only media present were the following:
A. Three U.S. media reps (Molly Bailey, Diana De Rosa and Ken Braddick)
B. Three Canadians (Cealy Tetley, Karen Robinson and her husband)
C. One Argentine and 2 Brazilians
D. Three USEF reps (no photographers)

During finals/jumping the number increased with media reps, primarily photographers, from:
A. Wire services (AP, Reuters, AFP, EFE)
B. Brazilian newspapers and magazines
C. Brazilian TV (O Globo, Folha)
D. Occasional other foreign media rep (e.g. Jennifer Anstey of Canada, one other photographer who came just for the eventing, the Jamaican guy when the Jamaican eventer was competing, the French writer for breed reports).

Photography

This in general worked out well. The ability to shoot from most any place around the arena and the fact that we were allowed to shoot from the seats as long as we werenÃ?¢ââ??‰â??¢t blocking anyone was great. There was also a covered seating area where we could shoot from when it rained and this was much appreciated since we had a couple of rainy and overcast days. On cross country day the situation worked out okay but we were not allowed to walk the course ahead of time and therefore had no time to prepare for what we would want to photograph. Instead many of us just opted to stay at one jump because we werenÃ?¢ââ??‰â??¢t aware of our options.

Press Conference Room

A portable building was used for this important space. It was too small and the sound was terrible. The windows would make a vibrating noise when the air conditioning was operating. There were so many translations that I wonder if there couldnÃ?¢ââ??‰â??¢t have been a better and quicker way to do the press conferences. The U.S. would have their team do a separate press conference beforehand or afterwards in order to quickly get some quotes and this worked well.

Press Room Sub Center

This space was not accessible for a sufficient amount of time each day. According to the staff, the facility would open and close two hours prior to and after each day of competition. They did not take into account awards ceremonies or press conferences or jogs or training days. Consequently, the timing of when the press room was opened and closed was extremely inconvenient. We were forced to stop working our deadline projects until we could get to the next location. The Press Room should be open starting early in the morning and should have stayed open for about 5 or 6 hours after the event was over so that we could have finished our work and get it sent to meet our deadline. There were times that when we arrived the Press Room was closed. On several occasions, w arrived at the press facility to find it closed, and had to wait hours for it to open. Additionally, the press room should have been open much longer after the end of competition. Many people had to take shuttles to the MPC or to hotels to complete their work when they should have done so in the venue press room.

Security

The safety concerns proved to be no problem as there were so many police around that we never once felt threatened or afraid. However, there were times at the venue when the security limited to an extreme our access to areas that would have been appropriate for the media to go into.

Staff

One very positive note was how helpful everyone was. The staff were always as helpful as they could be within the boundaries set for them. The bureaucracy was a huge issue. They did what they could within the rules and they were always there for us when we needed them.

Transportation

The shuttles were good and bad. To begin with there was no consistent shuttle schedule. It changed from day-to-day. Sometimes they were there on time and other times not. We waited for 2 hours more than once for a bus when we were on deadline. We had to take a shuttle to the Main Press Center and from there to our accommodations and sometimes those shuttles were on time and other times not. However, taxis from the MPC were an option when things did not work out and fortunately they were plentiful and not too expensive.

Venue

The Venue for dressage and show jumping was wonderful. The arena was very much like an Olympic arena and probably the nicest of any arena weÃ?¢ââ??‰â??¢ve seen at a Pan American Games. The cross country was okay but not great. All the riders applauded the facilities Ã?¢ââ??‰â?¬Å? both stabling and competition areas.

Water

There was always plenty of water available and they even came around and gave us water when we were shooting outside the arena.

The best thing about the press experience at the Pan American Games in Rio de Janeiro was the attitude of the staff. Of course, they could only solve so many problems as they were being managed by a very bureaucratic system.

FEI WEG 2006 – Photographers Overview

Overview

The overwhelming majority of photographers questioned, highlighted the fact there was very little communication between themselves and the management. Added to this the Photo Manager had no authority and decisions as to positions of photo pens were out of his hands. There was no response to emails prior to the Games and despite best efforts of staff behind the media desk, precious little information during the Games. It was suggested that there were daily photographers meetings but these rarely happened.

Photo Pens

In the Main arena these were too small and badly positioned in several instances. During the dressage the pen at the far end of the arena, looking back to the new grandstand, was looking into empty seats; a phenomenon we are used to at Olympic Games, but not in Aachen. On cross-country, again pens were way too small and badly positioned. It was only by last minute discussion that these were revised. In particular the water fence where most photographers worked had to be enlarged by some twenty fold.

Officials at cross country fences and crossing stewards were mostly helpful, but I understand there were a number of problems on the driving marathon where positions and movement around the area had been agreed with the Course Designer in advance by Dirk Caremans and Arnd Bronkhurst, but these were rescinded on the day with no explanation.

Vaulting/Reining Arena

There was confusion as to whether photographers could work from seats or not, with some being allowed and others not. There needs to be much clearer instruction on this. During preliminary competitions when there are many empty seats, why should photographers not be allowed to work there? The reining posed problems when a commercial photographer set up lights all along one side of the arena and tried to stop all other photographers from working there. This was only resolved when Niels Knippertz was called and the photographer was made to remove his lights. This problem of a commercial photographer trying to take control only seems to happen in reining and occurred to a lesser extent in Jerez. This should not be allowed to happen again and commercial photographers will have to take their chance along with the rest.

Medal Ceremonies

The Ceremonies in the main arena were chaotic. This was a result of not allowing for the number of photographers accredited and officials involved in the medal ceremony being badly positioned. Forward planning and better briefing would have avoided much of this confusion. One answer would be to use mobile risers, which would enable more photographers to get into a smaller area. Presenters also need to be briefed to pose for the cameras.

Workroom

This worked well splitting photographers and journalists, with room enough to work. The Technology was very fast and reliable. The large lockers were ideal with plenty of room for equipment, but not enough of them.

Shuttles

There was a mixed reaction to these at the endurance. For some these worked others found they ran late and were not keeping up with the leading riders. Those with their own cars who had studied the route were best off.

Guidelines for Fence Judges

There should be guidelines for judges and officials on cross-country and the marathon section of driving. These guidelines should be explained to judges at pre-event briefings.

Creating pens for photographers

These should be negotiated in advance of the event between a nominated photographer who understands the sport and the course designer or technical delegate, particularly in the case of WEG. It is difficult to try and arrange these once the event has started. A number of established events have procedures for photographers but there are a number where there needs to be discussion. For show jumping, when there are a large number of fence judges in the arena, they should be asked to remain in one spot. In Aachen they tended to wander about and consequently got shouted at by photographers, which is not desirable and causes bad feelings on both sides.

Security

Adequate lockers must be provided as pilfering has been a problem at all WEGs and other events. If there is not enough staff for full time security then could a CCTV system be installed? Big Brother maybe but it is a solution. I would also urge all photographers and journalists to use security cables for their laptops. Much of the thieving is opportunistic and cables will deter all but the most determined thief.

Accreditation

Too many photographers were accredited. I blame the organisation of WEG for this. Events like to boast about how many media will be attending their event. All helps with sponsorship no doubt, but if events are going to do that then they must provide adequate facilities. An attempt was made to separate specialist photographers by issuing bibs for certain of the stadiums, however all these bibs were the same colour the only distinguishing part being the number of the stadium printed on one side of the bib. After a couple of days most officials gave up looking at bibs so everyone went where they wanted. If this system is to be tried in future events then the bibs must be of different colours and photographers made aware that they can only go to the venue/s they have been allocated.

The other issue raised by Edith de Reys who was working behind the desk in Aachen and has done so for at least three WEGs was the problem of journalists wanting to be photographers as well, and the “office camera” syndrome where a camera is given to whatever journalist is covering the event and told to take pictures. These people are a major irritant particularly when they ask other photographers how to operate their cameras or they wander about with no heed to what is going on.

Conclusion

Many of the points made by photographers were valid, but I felt that a number of the complaints were spurious and their seems to be an ethos creeping in that photographers expect everything to be handed to them on a plate. At an event of the size and complexity of WEG there are always going to be problems and compromises have to be made.

Worryingly was the complaint that certain photographers found shooting spots which hadn’t been seen or thought of by other photographers. I know that many photographers suffer from the herd instinct but if everyone were to shoot only from officially designated spots one may just as well restrict accreditation to a handful of photographers who can then hand out their pictures on a rota basis. There should be more flexibility to allow certain unofficial positions to be used, provided of course they do not impede the public or interfere with the competition in any way.

Much more liaison between photographers and the organisers of events is needed.

Report on the Press Service at Aachen FEI WEG 2006

Following the 2006 FEI World Equestrian Games IAEJ has decided to put together a few comments and considerations on the press service. These notes are meant to represent ‘lessons learnt’ for the organisers of major events. It is the goal of the IAEJ to distribute them to the FEI and the organisers.

Foreword

Generally speaking the service was average and several media complained. The major problem was the lack of care and attention (as well as experience) of the staff of the media centre and the total confusion on the actual leadership of Press Services. Niels Knippertz signed all correspondence with the press in the months prior the event as the Press Officer. While during WEG he was not at the Press Centre liasing with the media, where Helga Raue dealt with the accredited press. In addition it was clear that the Press Officer/s had no previous experience with sport events of this magnitude and therefore some simple procedures (such as liaising with Technical Officials before organising a cross-country course walk for press or establishing photo positions) were not followed. It is vital for a successful press service that the Press Officer has previous experience in press operations at major sport events.

Press Centre

The area dedicated to the workroom for press turned out to be sufficient, despite having the press conference area set up within the main workroom which was not satisfying. Facilities in media centre were of good standard. Wi-fi worked fine, but there was a lack of monitors to follow close circuit coverage of competitions. Location of press conference area was bad. Too small, too noisy, audio system and microphones not up to the level required.

The press tribunes in the main stadium were not clearly marked and not properly manned. Also non-members of the accredited press could occupy them, with the result of some press remaining with no seats during key events. No print distribution was planned in tribunes (intermediate results, start lists, releases).

Information/News Service

The level of information was inadequate, especially during the first few days. Clearly Jumping and Dressage were given priority in generating news and information for the press. Many new reports (such us the Medal Count and the WEG by Numbers) were only produced in German and not provided at all in English. Pigeon holes and trays for distribution of results/news releases in the Press Centre were not sufficient and badly organised.

Mixed Zones/Training Areas

These were the most successful aspects of WEG 2006 press service. Accredited press could very easily access the competitors, and there were many areas were press could freely interact with riders/officials and set up private interviews. Access/viewing to training areas was granted at all time to accredited press. Very positive!

Report on the Press Service for Endurance at Aachen FEI WEG 2006

I covered the Endurance competition for the 2006 WEG. This competition was held on the first day of the Games, Monday August 21, 2006. I know that I was not alone in feeling as though we had come in during “dress rehearsals” at the Press Center.

Press stand and photo ops

During the Opening Ceremonies, press was directed to stand in one roped off area in the stadium. There was not enough room for all of the photographers, nor did it allow room for photo taking without other photog’s heads. Everyone spread out the best they could, but the direction for Press was vague, at best.

For the endurance Awards Ceremony, the press was shuffled off to the side, making photos difficult. There were now photogs 6 deep, and none but the longest lens could capture the podium.

I would like to add something here about the endurance journalists. Endurance is a specific discipline that takes a good deal of endurance itself to follow. Heading out by 4 or 5 am, the endurance journalist strives to stay in front of the riders for photos and stats while checking information available at Vet Gates for official pulls and changes in the lead. This is along any road or trail in all conditions during a 24 hour period, through every sort of weather. The day after the ride, when many of the stadium photographers had just arrived, those of us that had followed the ride the day before found ourselves elbowed and blocked at the awards ceremony by the larger stadium and TV lenses. There should be some credit for journalists covering specific disciplines. Might there be some way to insure that the discipline specific journalist has needed access for photos? If the IAEJ Photographer’s Delegate covers this, it would work well to have the name of that Delegate made available via signage or electronic communiquÃ?Æ?Ã?©, to be sure that our needs are known and conveyed to the correct party.

Pressroom

The working pressroom was fairly organized, except that there were not enough electrical outlets for equipment, nor cable lines for Internet. There was no set-up to print out anything, nor was there a common computer with information (background, information, profiles, etc.) with a printer attached. In Jerez there were several computers, and the information on rider/horses was up-to-date. There were no lockers available of which I was aware.

Press Conferences were not announced and were easy to miss. In fact, there were several that occurred while we were sitting in the Press Center, but not announced. The Press Staff tried to pull together what we needed as we asked, but the most important thing we needed was information on our discipline, which was not available.

Entrants list and map of the course

There was no pre-entry lists or profiles nor anything else made available in the pressroom before the endurance event. The approved entry list did appear by 8 pm the evening before the event. The course map was available only if you could access the database for the WEG online. The online map was entirely too small to see any detail, and then there was the issue of no printer. There was not enough course information available, specifically on what to expect for the start and end of the race, best places to be and photograph. There were no drivers provided for the Press. We rented our own car and spent 2 days going over the endurance route. As the OC bussed out tourists to many of the choice spots, this was problematical for photos as hundreds of onlookers crowded access and trails.

Press Badges

We were given bibs to take photos for the Opening Ceremony, but these same bibs were not good for the Awards Ceremony, and we had to go back and get an official to let us into the Stadium at the last minute. The reason for this was explained as a choice made at accreditation, an unclear concept for many journalists who also take their own photos.

There was no Press parking nor shuttle for PressÃ?¢ââ??¬Ã?¦. and parking was quite far from the venue and sometimes impossible to access. As this event required journalists to check in between loops for stats at the Vet Check, it would have been ideal to be able to find parking quickly and head back to the trail. Some accommodation for Press to come and go or be dropped off would have worked well. We had to park and walk/run for 20 minutes to get back to our car after finding the start. It was obvious that the Organizing Committee did not understand Press needs for this discipline.

Accreditation

I did not receive any official word from the OC until about a week before I left for Germany. I did check with the FEI several times starting two months prior to the WEG to make sure that I had been accepted and could complete assignments as given. The FEI representative assured me that I was to be accredited, but paperwork was slow in coming from the OC.

Food

There was very adequate cafeteria-style food service that served participants, press and officials. It was a bit of a walk, but was well done. For the first two days at the Press Center, there was nothing but drinks: available was coffee, water and soda. On the day we were leaving when dressage and vaulting Press were arriving, cookies and various snacks appeared at the counter.

Looking forward to Lexington, I am sure that some of these things will be remedied, as the OC seems to be taking an active interest in each discipline to find out what might be needed. I would be happy to help work with the OC in what will be needed to cover the endurance event.